Phenotypic and morphobiometric characterization of local chicken (Gallus gallus) in family breeding on the outskirts of Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of Congo

Phenotypic and morphobiometric characterisation of local chicken

Authors

  • Elie-Ishnel Ishara-Nshombo Department of Molecular Biology, Genomics and Animal Genetic Improvement, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lubumbashi-1825, Democratic Republic of Congo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7061-732X
  • Gael Nzuzi-Mavungu Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lubumbashi-1825, Democratic Republic of Congo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6310-1736
  • Jean-Christophe Kashala-Kapalwola Department of Molecular Biology, Genomics and Animal Genetic Improvement, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lubumbashi-1825, Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Hortense Kalenga-Kalamo Department of Molecular Biology, Genomics and Animal Genetic Improvement, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lubumbashi-1825, Democratic Republic of Congo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62310/liab.v2i2.85

Keywords:

Phenotypic characterisation, Diversity, Peri-urban, Morphobiometric, Local chicken, Lubumbashi

Abstract

This study, with a main goal to characterise the local chicken at phenotypic and morphobiometric level, was conducted from September 2019 to January 2020 in three outlying districts of Lubumbashi city in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). A total of 116 adult females and 64 adult males were photographed, described, and measured individually. The main results indicated that the phenotypic traits of the local chicken studied were very heterogeneous. Indeed, four main types of feather distribution were observed – normal feathering (80.56%), crested head (17.22%), naked-neck (1.67%), and feathered shank (0.56%). For feather morphology, normal plumage (98.33%) dominated frizzled plumage (1.67%). Plumage colouring varied with the predominance of black (15.00%), millefiori (10.56%), salmon pink (9.44%), and fawn (8.89%) colours. The single comb was the most common (96.67%) having usually the red (51.67%) or pink (35.56%) colour. The colour of wattles was dominated by red (58.89%) followed by pink (33.89%), while the predominant earlobe colour was red (32.78%) followed by red-white (23.33%) and white (21.67%). Among the eye colours, orange-red predominated (73.33%) followed by dark-brown (11.11%) and yellow-brown (9.44%). Most of the birds were having white skin colour (56.67%) followed by pink (22.22%) and yellow (21.11%). The shank colour was predominantly white (34.44%) followed by yellow (23.89%), grey (19.44%), black (16.67%), and green (5.56%). Regarding morphobiometric traits, the average live body weight of the local peri-urban chicken of Lubumbashi was 1.25 ± 0.52 kg in males and 1.06 ± 0.29 kg in females. Body weight and other body measurements vary significantly (p<0.001) depending on sex and in favour of males. Body weight was strongly and significantly correlated with shank circumference and chest circumference with a coefficient of 0.86 and 0.80, respectively.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Abdelqader A, Wollny CBA, Gauly M. (2008). On-farm investigation of local chicken biodiversity and performance potentials in rural areas of Jordan. Animal Genetic Resources 43: 49-58.

Aklilu HA. (2007). Village poultry in Ethiopia: Socio-technical analysis and learning with famers. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp178.

Akouango F, Mouangou F, Ganongo G. (2004). Phenotypes et performances d’élevage chez des populations locales de volailles du genre Gallus gallus au Congo Brazzaville. Cahiers Agricultures 13(3) : 257-262.

Apuno AA, Mbap ST, Ibrahim T. (2011). Characterization of local chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) in Shelleng and Song local government areas of Adamawa state, Nigeria. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America 2(1): 6-14.

Badubi SS, Rakereng M, Marumo M. (2006). Morphological characteristics and feed

resources available for indigenous chickens in Botswana. Livestock Research for Rural Development 18(1). http:// www.lrrd.org/lrrd18/1/badu18003.htm

Batimsoga BB, Lombo Y. (2009). Caractérisation des populations locales de poules dans la région de La Kara. Rapport d'activité, Institut Togolais de Recherche Agronomique, Centre de Recherche Agronomique de la Savane Sèche (CRA-SS).

Bembide C, Hako Touko BA, Manjeli Y, Keambou Tiambo C. (2013). Caractérisation morphobiométrique de la poule locale en Centrafrique. Animal Genetic Resources 53: 33-44.

Bonou GA. (2006). Diversité génétique des populations locales de volaille de l’espèce Gallus

gallus au Sud et au Nord du Bénin. Mémoire d’Ingénieur des travaux. EPAC/PSA, pp 78.

Bulgarella M, Wilson RE, Kopuchian C, Valqui TH, McCracken KG. (2007). Elevational variation in body size of crested ducks (Lophonetta specularioides) from the central high Andes, Mendoza, and Patagonia, Ornitologia Neotropical 18: 587-602.

Chabi TR. (2008). Caractérisation phénotypique et gestion de la population de poulets locaux dans les communes de Dassa et deToffo au Bénin. Mémoire DEA, Université d’Abomey-Calavi, pp 74.

Coquerelle G. (2000). Les poules : Diversité Génétique Visible. Ed. Quae. Institut National De la Recherche Agronomique, France. p. 13-18; 181.

Crawford R.D. (1990). Poultry Biology: Origin and history of poultry species. In: Crawford RD, editor, Poultry Breeding and Genetics. Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Amsterdam and New York, pp 1–42.

Desta TT, Dessie T, Bettridge J, Lynch SE, Melese K, Collins M, Christley RM, Wigley P, Kaiser P, Terfa Z, Mwacharo JM, Hanotte O. (2013). Signature of artificial selection and ecological landscape on morphological structures of Ethiopian village chickens. Animal Genetic Resources 52: 17-29.

FAO (2005). Genetic characterization of livestock populations and its use in conservation decision making, by Hannotte O, Jianlin H. In: J. Ruane, A Sonnino, editors, The role of biotechnology in exploring and protecting agricultural genetic resources, Rome, pp 89–96. www.fao.org/docrep/009/a0399e/a0399e00.htm

FAO (2013). Caractérisation phénotypique des ressources génétiques animales. Directives production et la santé animale, No. 11, Rome.

McGuire S. (2015). FAO, IFAD, and WFP. The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2015: Meeting the 2015 International Hunger Targets: Taking Stock of Uneven Progress. Rome: FAO, 2015. Advances in Nutrition 6(5): 623–624.

Fayeye TR, Ayorinde KL, Ojo V, Adesina OM. (2006). Frequency and influence of some major genes on body weight and body size parameters of Nigerian local chickens. Livestock Research for Rural Development 18. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd18/3/ faye18037.htm

Fotsa JC, Rognon X, Tixier-Boichard M, Coquerelle G, Pone Kamdem D, Ngou Ngoupayou JD, Manjeli Y, Bordas A. (2010). Caractérisation phénotypique des populations de poules locales (Gallus gallus) de la zone forestière dense humide à pluviométrie bimodale du Cameroun. Animal Genetic Resources 46: 49-59.

Galal S. (2006). Protéger les ressources génétiques de poulets locaux dans une situation pandémique d’influenza aviaire en Egypte. Note de Communication No. 2, Bulletin RIDAF, Vol. 16, No. 1.

Getu A, Alemayehu K, Wuletaw Z. (2014). Phenotypic characterization of indigenous chicken ecotypes in North Gondar zone, Ethiopia. Global Veterinaria 12(3): 361-368.

Gnikpo AF. (2006). Contribution à la conservation de la biodiversité aviaire : Description phénotypique et évaluation des performances de croissance du poulet Sahouè dans le Mono (Sud Bénin). Thèse d’Ingénieur Agronome, FSA, pp 107.

Gueye EF. (1998). Village egg and fowl meat production in Africa. World's Poultry Science 54: 73-86.

Guni FS, Katule AM, Mwakilembe PAA. (2013). Characterization of local chickens in selected districts of the Southern Highlands of Tanzania: II. Production and Morphometric traits. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 25. http://www.lrrd.org/ lrrd25/11/guni25190.htm.

Hako TBA, Manjeli Y, Awah-Ndukum J, Keambou T C. (2009). Influence du type génétique et du sexe sur les paramètres hématologiques et la viabilité de la poule locale Camerounaise (Gallus domesticus). Livestock Research for Rural Development 21(199). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd21/11/hako21199.htm

Haoua MT. (2010). Morphobiometrical and production system characterization of indigenous chicken populations in the Sudano-sahelian zone of Cameroon. FASA/UDs, MSc thesis. Dschang, Cameroon. pp 85.

Horst P. (1989). Native fowl as reservoir for genomes and major genes with direct and indirect effects on the adaptability and their potential for tropically orientated breeding plans. Archiv fur Gefluegelkunde 53(3): 93-101.

Jesuyon OMA, Salako AE. (2013). Variability and predictability of productive and body traits of Fulani ecotype chicken. African Journal of Agriculture Research 8: 6178-6184.

Keambou TC, Manjeli Y, Tchoumboue J, Teguia A, Iroume RN. (2007). Caractérisation morphobiométrique des ressources génétiques de poules locales des hautes terres de l'ouest Cameroun. Livestock Research for Rural Development 19 (8). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd19/8/keam19107.htm

Lariviere J-M, Leroy P. (2008). Conservation et valorisation de la diversité des ressources génétiques du poulet en Europe : initiatives et perspectives. Annales de Medecine Veterinaire 152: 203-220.

Mahammi FZ, Gaouar SBS, Tabet-Aoul NT, Tixier-Boichard M, Saidi-Mehtar N. (2014). Caractéristiques morpho-biométriques et systèmes d’élevage des poules locales en Algérie occidentale (Oranie). Cahier Agriculture 23(6): 382-392.

Moula N, Antoine-Moussiaux N, Farnir F, Detilleux J, Leroy P. (2009). Réhabilitation socioéconomique d’une poule locale en voie d’extinction : la poule Kabyle. Annales de Medecine Veterinaire 153: 178-186.

Moula N, Luc DD, Dang PK, Farnir F, Ton VD, Binh DV, Leroy P, Moussiaux NA. (2011). The Ri chicken breed and livelihoods in North Vietnam: characterization and prospects. Journal of Agriculture Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics 112(1): 57-69.

Moula N, Farnir F, Salhi A, Iguerouada M, Leroy P, Antoine- Moussiaux N. (2012a). Backyard poultry in Kabylie (Algeria): from an indigenous chicken to a local poultry breed. Animal Genetic Resources 50: 87-96.

Moula N, Detiffe N, Farnir F, Antoine-Moussiaux N, Leroy P. (2012b). Aviculture familiale au Bas-Congo, République Démocratique du Congo (RDC). Livestock Research for Rural Development 24. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/5/moul24074.htm

Msoffe PLM, Mtambo MMA, Minga UM, Gwakisa PS, Mdegela RH, Olsen JE. (2002). Productivity and natural disease resistance potential of free ranging local chicken ecotypes in Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development 14(3). https:// www.lrrd.cipav.org.co/lrrd14/3/msof143.htm

Navara KJ, Anderson EM et Edwards ML. (2012). Comb size and colour relate to sperm quality: a test of the phenotype-linked fertility hypothesis. Journal of Behavioural Ecology 23(5): 1036-1041.

Nigussie D, Tadelle D, Liesbeth H, van der Waaij LD, van Arendonk JAM. (2010). Morphological features of indigenous chicken populations in Ethiopia. Animal Genetic Resources 46: 11–23.

Richard F, Renee B, Caritez J. (1969). Déterminisme héréditaire du caractère "Crête pâle" chez la poule. (INRA, Éd.). Annales de Génétique et de Sélection Animale I(1): 33-37.

Wani CE. (2008). Genetic and phenotypic characterisation of the sudanese indigenous chicken using molecular biology techniques. PhD thesis, Faculty of Animal Production, University of Khartoum, Sudan.

Yapi-Gnaore CV, Loukou NV, N’Guetta ASP, Kayang B, Rognon X, TixierBoichard M, Toure G, Coulibaly Y, Youssao I. (2010). Diversités phénotypique et morphométrique des poulets locaux (Gallus gallus) de deux zones agroécologiques de Côte d’Ivoire. Cahier Agriculture 19(6): 439-445.

Downloads

Published

22-08-2022

How to Cite

Ishara-Nshombo, E.-I., Nzuzi-Mavungu, G., Kashala-Kapalwola, J.-C., & Kalenga-Kalamo, H. (2022). Phenotypic and morphobiometric characterization of local chicken (Gallus gallus) in family breeding on the outskirts of Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of Congo: Phenotypic and morphobiometric characterisation of local chicken. Letters In Animal Biology, 2(2), 06–16. https://doi.org/10.62310/liab.v2i2.85

Issue

Section

Research Articles
Recieved 2022-08-05
Accepted 2022-08-20
Published 2022-08-22