Rumen microbial system, methanogenesis, and methane mitigation strategies in ruminants
Methanogenesis in ruminants
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62310/liab.v2i1.73Keywords:
Rumen microbes, Fermentation, H2 sinks, Cattle, Greenhouse gas, Propionate productionAbstract
Much of the biomass in this world is rich in fibre which is utilised by the ruminants with the help of rumen microbes to produce a good quality protein for human consumption. However, this conversion of fibre to high-quality protein is paralleled by the production of methane which represents the wastage of feed energy and is a powerful greenhouse gas harmful to the global climate. The microbial community in the rumen has co-evolved with their host animal in a symbiotic relationship over millions of years and methanogenesis has emerged as a result of the refinement of the fermentation process in the rumen. The one-to-one relationship between the methanogen population and the methanogenesis has not been established yet, which indicates the role of associated rumen microbiota, substrate availability, and other functional parameters of the rumen. This review has focused on the total rumen microbial structure, methanogen structure, rumen fermentation process, methanogenesis, factors affecting methane production, and methane mitigation strategies. The balance between the H2 producers and H2 consumers in the rumen determines the level of methane production in the rumen. Therefore, decreasing the availability of H2 in the rumen by fostering alternative H2 sinks, such as propionate production, is very instrumental in reducing the rumen methane emissions. Any strategy of methane abatement should concurrently consider the enhancement of propionate production to prevent the inhibition of rumen functions. Although a great deal of information regarding the rumen microbial community structure, rumen physiology, and methane mitigation strategies is currently available, more research is still needed. The majority of the in vivo experiments pertaining to methane abatement strategies discussed in this review are the short term experiments in which long term unwanted effects could not be precisely predicted. Therefore, there is a need for long-term experiments to draw valid and logical conclusions on the methane abatement strategies.
Metrics
References
Abecia L, Martín-Garcia A, Martínez G, Newbold C, Yanez-Ruiz DR. (2013). Nutritional intervention in early life to manipulate rumen microbial colonization and methane output by kid goats post-weaning. Journal of Animal Science 91: 4832–4840.
Baca-Gonzalez V, Asensio-Calavia P, Gonzalez-Acosta S, Perez de la Lastra JM, Morales de la Nuez A. (2020). Are vaccines the solution for methane emissions from ruminants? A systematic review. Vaccines 8: 460.
Beauchemin KA, Kreuzer M, O’Mara F, McAllister TA. (2008). Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48: 21–27.
Beauchemin KA, McGinn SM, Martinez TF, McAllister TA. (2007). Use of condensed tannin extract from quebracho trees to reduce methane emissions from cattle. Journal of Animal Science 85,(8): 1990–1996.
Beauchemin KA, McGinn SM. (2005). Methane emissions from feedlot cattle fed barley or corn diets. Journal of Animal Science 83: 653–661.
Beauchemin KA, McGinn SM. (2006). Methane emissions from beef cattle: effects of fumaric acid, essential oil, and canola oil. Journal of Animal Science 84: 1489–1496.
Beauchemin KA, Ungerfeld EM, Eckard RJ, Wang M. (2020). Fifty years of research on rumen methanogenesis: Lessons learned and future challenges for mitigation. Animal 14, 2–16.
Begum J, Buyamayum B, Lingaraju MC, Dev K. (2021). Probiotics: Role in immunomodulation and consequent effects. Letters in Animal Biology 01(1): 01-06.
Belanche A, de la Fuente G, Newbold CJ. (2014). Study of methanogen communities associated with different rumen protozoal populations. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 90: 663–77.
Benchaar C, Pomar C, Chiquette J. (2001). Evaluation of dietary strategies to reduce methane production in ruminants: a modelling approach. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 81: 563–574.
Black JL, Davison TM, Box I. (2021). Methane emissions from ruminants in Australia: Mitigation potential and applicability of mitigation strategies. Animals 11: 951.
Boadi D, Benchaar C, Chiquette J, Masse D. (2004). Mitigation strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: update review. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 84: 319–335.
Bryngelsson D, Wirsenius S, Hedenus F, Sonesson U. (2016). How can the EU climate targets be met? A combined analysis of technological and demand-side changes in food and agriculture. Food Policy 59: 152-164.
Busquet M, Calsamiglia S, Ferret A, Carro MD and Kamel C. (2005). Effect of garlic oil and four of its compounds on rumen microbial fermentation. Journal of Dairy Science 88: 4393–4404.
Calsamiglia S, Busquet M, Cardozo PW, Castillejos L, Ferret A. (2007). Invited review: essential oils as modifiers of rumen microbial fermentation. Journal of Dairy Science 90(6): 2580–2595.
Carulla JE, Kreuzer M, Machmuller A, Hess HD. (2005). Supplementation of Acacia mearnsii tannins decreases methanogenesis and urinary nitrogen in forage-fed sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56(9): 961–970.
Danielsson R, Dicksved J, Sun L, Gonda H, Muller B, Schnurer A, Bertilsson J. (2017). Methane production in dairy cows correlates with rumen methanogenic and bacterial community structure. Frontiers in Microbiology 8: 226.
Danielsson R, Schnurer A, Arthurson V, Bertilsson J. (2012). Methanogenic population and CH4 production in Swedish dairy cows fed different levels of forage. Applied Environment Microbiology 78: 6172–6179.
Danielsson R. (2016). Methane production in dairy cows: Impact of feed and rumen microbiota. PhD thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden. pp 45. Available at http://pub.epsilon.slu.se/13308/1/danielsson_r_160427.pdf.
Davison TM, Black JL, Moss JF. (2020). Red meat – An essential partner to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions. Animal Frontiers 10: 14-21.
de Oliveira SG, Berchielli TT, Pedreira MDS, Primavesi O, Frighetto R, Lima MA. (2007). Effect of tannin levels in sorghum silage and concentrate supplementation on apparent digestibility and methane emission in beef cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology 135(3-4): 236–248.
Denman SE, Martinez FG, Shinkai T, Mitsumori M, McSweeney CS. (2015). Metagenomic analysis of the rumen microbial community following inhibition of methane formation by a halogenated methane analog. Frontiers in Microbiology 6: 1087.
DeRamus HA, Clement TC, Giampola DD, Dickison PC. (2003). Methane emissions of beef cattle on forages: Efficiency of grazing management systems. Journal of Environmental Quality 32: 269–277.
Dijkstra J, Bannink A, France J, Kebreab E. (2007). Nutritional control to reduce environmental impacts of intensive dairy cattle systems. In: Meng QX, Ren LP, Cao ZJ, editors, Proceedings of the VII International Symposium on the Nutrition of Herbivores . China Agricultural University Press, Beijing, China, pp. 411–435.
Donoghue KA, Herd RM, Bird SH, Arthur PF, Hegarty RF. (2013). Preliminary genetic parameters for methane production in Australian beef cattle. In: Proceedings of the twentieth conference association for the advancement of animal breeding and genetics, 20–23th October, Napier, New Zealand, pp. 290–293.
Eckard RJ, Grainger C, de Klein CAM. (2010). Options for the abatement of methane and nitrous oxide from ruminant production: A review. Livestock Science 130: 47–56.
Ellis JL, Kebreab E, Odongo NE, McBride BW, Okine EK, France J. (2007). Prediction of methane production from dairy and beef cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 90(7): 3456–3467.
Eugene M, Masse D, Chiquette J, Benchaar C. (2008). Meta- analysis on the effects of lipid supplementation on methane production in lactating dairy cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 88(2): 331–334.
FAO (2021). FAOSTAT Statistical Database. Available online: https://search.library.wisc.edu/catalog/999890171702121 (accessed on 8 February 2021).
FAO. (2017). The Future of food and agriculture–Trends and challenges; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/y4252e/y4252e07.htm (accessed on 9 March 2021).
Fennessy P, Byrne T, Proctor L, Amer P. (2019). The potential impact of breeding strategies to reduce methane output from beef cattle. Animal Production Science 59: 1598–1610.
Foley PA, Kenny DA, Callan JJ, Boland TM, O’mara FP. (2009). Effect of DL- malic acid supplementation on feed intake, methane emission, and rumen fermentation in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 87: 1048–1057.
Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Falcucci A, Tempio G. (2013). Tackling climate change through livestock—A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Rome, Italy, ISBN 978-92-5-107920-1.
Gonzalez-Recio O, Lopez-Paredes J, Ouatahar L, Charfeddine N, Ugarte E, Alenda R, Jimenez-Montero J. (2020). Mitigation of greenhouse gases in dairy cattle via genetic selection: 2. Incorporating methane emissions into the breeding goal. Journal of Dairy Science 103: 7210–7221.
Goopy JP. (2019). Creating a low enteric methane emission ruminant: What is the evidence of success to the present and prospects for developing economies? Animal Production Science 59: 1769–1776.
Gruninger RJ, Puniya AK, Callaghan TM, Edwards JE, Youssef N, Dagar SS, Fliegerova K, Griffith GW, Forster R, Tsang A, McAllister T, Elshahed MS. (2014). Anaerobic fungi (phylum Neocallimastigomycota): advances in understanding their taxonomy, life cycle, ecology, role and biotechnological potential. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 90: 01-17.
Guan H, Wittenberg KM, Ominski KH, Krause DO. (2006). Efficacy of ionophores in cattle diets for mitigation of enteric methane. Journal of Animal Science 84: 1896–1906.
Guo YQ, Liu JX, Lu Y, Zhu WY, Denman SE, McSweeney CS. (2008). Effect of tea saponin on methanogenesis, microbial community structure and expression of mcrA gene, in cultures of rumen micro-organisms. Letters in Applied Microbiology 47(5): 421–426.
Guyader J, Eugene M, Noziere P, Morgavi DP, Doreau M, Martin C. (2014). Influence of rumen protozoa on methane emission in ruminants: a meta-analysis approach. Animal 8: 1816–25.
Harrison MT, McSweeney C, Tomkins NW, Eckard RJ. (2015). Improving greenhouse gas emissions intensities of subtropical and tropical beef farming systems using Leucaena leucocephala.
Agricultural System 136: 138–146.
Hegarty RS, Bird SH, Vanselow BA, Woodgate R. (2008). Effects of the absence of protozoa from birth or from weaning on the growth and methane production of lambs. British Journal of Nutrition 100: 1220–1227.
Hegarty RS. (1999). Reducing rumen methane emissions through elimination of rumen protozoa. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50: 1321–1327.
Henderson G, Cox F, Ganesh S, Jonker A, Young W, Janssen PH. (2015). Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range. Scientific Reports 5: 14567.
Herd RM, Arthur PF, Donoghue KA, Bird SH, Bird-Gardiner T, Hegarty RS. (2014). Measures of methane production and their phenotypic relationships with dry matter intake, growth, and body composition traits in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 92: 5267–5274.
Holtshausen L, Chaves AV, Beauchemin KA, McGinn SM, McAllister TA, Odongo NE, Cheeke PR, Benchaar C. (2009). Feeding saponin-containing Yucca schidigera and Quillaja saponaria to decrease enteric methane production in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 92(6): 2809–2821.
Hook SE, Northwood KS, Wright ADG, McBride BW. (2009). Long-term monensin supplementation does not significantly affect the quantity or diversity of methanogens in the rumen of the lactating dairy cow. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75(2): 374–380.
Hook SE, Wright ADG, McBride BW. (2010). Methanogens: Methane Producers of the Rumen and Mitigation Strategies. Archaea 2010: 945785. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/945785
Janssen PH. (2010). Influence of hydrogen on rumen methane formation and fermentation balances through microbial growth kinetics and fermentation thermodynamics. Animal Feed Science and Technology 160: 1–22.
Jordan E, Lovett DK, Hawkins M, Callan JJ, O’Mara FP. (2006a). The effect of varying levels of coconut oil on intake, digestibility and methane output from continental cross beef heifers. Animal Science 82: 859–865.
Jordan E, Kenny D, Hawkins M, Malone R, Lovett DK, O’Mara FP. (2006b). Effect of refined soy oil or whole soybeans on intake, methane output, and performance of young bulls. Journal of Animal Science 84: 2418–2425.
Kennedy P, Charmley E. (2012). Methane yields from Brahman cattle fed tropical grasses and legumes. Animal Production Science 52: 225–239.
Kinley RD, Martinez-Fernandez G, Matthews MK, de Nys R, Magnusson M, Tomkins NW. (2020). Mitigating the carbon footprint and improving productivity of ruminant livestock agriculture using a red seaweed. Journal of Cleaner Production 259: 120836.
Kittelmann S, Pinares-Patino CS, Seedorf H, Kirk MR, Ganesh S, McEwan JC, Janssen PH (2014). Two different bacterial community types are linked with the low-methane emission trait in sheep. Plos One 9(7): e103171.
Kittelmann S, Pinares-Patino CS, Seedorf H, Kirk MR, McEwan JC, Janssen PH. (2016). Natural variation in methane emission of sheep fed on a lucerne pellet diet is unrelated to rumen ciliate community type. Microbiology 162: 459–465.
Kobayashi Y. (2010). Abatement of Methane Production from Ruminants: Trends in the Manipulation of Rumen Fermentation. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 23(3): 410-416.
Kong Y, He M, McAlister T, Seviour R, Forster R. (2010). Quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization of microbial communities in the rumens of cattle fed different diets. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 76(20): 6933–6938.
Ku-Vera JC, Jimenez-Ocampo R, Valencia-Salazar SS, Montoya-Flores MD, Molina-Botero IC, Arango J, Gomez-Bravo CA, Aguilar-Perez CF, Solorio-Sanchez FJ. (2020). Role of secondary plant metabolites on enteric methane mitigation in ruminants. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 7: 584.
Li X, Norman H, Kinley R, Laurence M, Wilmot M, Bender H, Nys RD, Tomkins N. (2016). Asparagopsis taxiformis decreases enteric methane production from sheep. Animal Production Science 58: 681–688.
Lovett DK, Lovell S, Stack L, Callan J, Finlay M, Conolly J and O’Mara FP. (2003). Effect of forage/concentrate ratio and dietary coconut oil level on methane output and performance of finishing beef heifers. Livestock Production Science 84: 135–146.
Macheboeuf D, Lassalas B, Ranilla MJ, Carro MD and Morgavi DP. (2006). Dose- response effect of diallyl disulfide on ruminal fermentation and methane production in vitro. Reproduction Nutrition Development 46: S103.
Machmuller A, Soliva CR, Kreuzer M. (2003). Methane-suppressing effect of myristic acid in sheep as affected by dietary calcium and forage proportion. British Journal of Nutrition 90: 529–540.
Martin C, Dubroeucq H, Micol D, Agabriel J, Doreau M. (2007a). Methane output from beef cattle fed different high-concentrate diets. In: Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, 2–4th April, Southport, UK, p. 46.
Martin C, Ferlay A, Chilliard Y, Doreau M. (2007b). Rumen methanogenesis of dairy cows in response to increasing levels of dietary extruded linseeds. In: : Ortigues-Marty I, Miraux N, Brand- Williams W, editors, Energy and protein metabolism and nutrition. EAAP publication no. 124, Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 609–610.
Martin C, Ferlay A, Chilliard Y, Doreau M. (2009). Decrease in methane emissions in dairy cows with increase in dietary linseed content. In: Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, 30th March–1st April, Southport, UK, p. 21.
Martin C, Morgavi DP, Doreau M. (2010). Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale. Animal 4(3): 351–365.
Martin C, Rouel J, Jouany JP, Doreau M, Chilliard Y. (2008). Methane output and diet digestibility in response to feeding dairy cows crude linseed, extruded linseed, or linseed oil. Journal of Animal Science 86: 2642–2650.
Mayberry D, Bartlett H, Moss J, Davison T, Herrero M. (2019). Pathways to carbon-neutrality for the Australian red meat sector. Agricultural Systems 175: 13-21.
McAllister TA, Meale SJ, Valle E, Guan LL, Zhou M, Kelly WJ, Henderson G, Attwood GT, Janssen PH. (2015). Use of genomics and transcriptomics to identify strategies to lower ruminal methanogenesis. Journal of Animal Science 93: 1431–1449.
McAllister TA, Newbold CJ. (2008). Redirecting rumen fermentation to reduce methanogenesis. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48: 7–13.
McCaughey WP, Wittenberg K, Corrigan D. (1999). Impact of pasture type on methane production by lactating beef cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 79: 221–226.
Meale SJ, Popova M, Saro C, Martin C, Bernard A, Lagree M, Yanez-Ruiz DR, Boudra H, Duval S, Morgavi DP. (2021). Early life dietary intervention in dairy calves results in a long-term reduction in methane emissions. Scientific Reports 11: 3003.
Millen DD, De Beni Arrigoni M, Lauritano Pacheco RD. (2016). Rumenology. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland.
Mitsumori M, Sun W. (2008). Control of rumen microbial fermentation for mitigating methane emissions from the rumen. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 21: 144-154.
Molano G, Knight TW, Clark H. (2008). Fumaric acid supplements have no effect on methane emissions per unit of feed intake in wether lambs. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(1-2): 165–168.
Molina I, Angarita E, Mayorga O, Chara J, Barahona-Rosales R. (2016). Effect of Leucaena leucocephala on methane production of Lucerna heifers fed a diet based on Cynodon plectostachyus. Livestock Science 185: 24–29.
Morgavi DP, Forano E, Martin C, Newbold CJ. (2010). Microbial ecosystem and methanogenesis in ruminants. Animal 4(7): 1024–1036.
Morgavi DP, Jouany JP, Martin C. (2008). Changes in methane emission and rumen fermentation parameters induced by refaunation in sheep. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48: 69–72.
Morgavi DP, Martin C, Jouany JP, Ranilla MJ. (2012). Rumen protozoa and methanogenesis: not a simple cause-effect relationship. British Journal of Nutrition 107: 388–397.
Mosoni P, Rochette Y, Graviou D, Martin C, Forano E, Morgavi DP. (2008). Influence of protozoa on the number of cellulolytic bacteria and methanogens in the rumen of sheep evaluated by qPCR. In Proceedings of 6th INRA-RRI Symposium on the gut microbiome, 18–20 June 2008, Clermont-Ferrand, France, p. 46.
Newbold CJ, de la Fuente G, Belanche A, Ramos-Morales E, McEwan NR. (2015). The role of ciliate protozoa in the rumen. Frontiers in Microbiology 6: 1313.
Nicholson MJ, Evans PN, Joblin KN. (2007). Analysis of methanogen diversity in the rumen using temporal temperature gradient gel electrophoresis: identification of uncultured methanogens. Microbial Ecology 54(1): 141–150.
Odongo NE, Bagg R, Vessie G, Dick P, Or-Rashid MM, Hook SE, Gray JT, Kebreab E, France J, McBride BW. (2007). Long-term effects of feeding monensin on methane production in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90(4): 1781–1788.
Pais DF, Marques AC, Fuinhas JA. (2020). Reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change and promote health: But is it good for the economy? Environmental Modeling and Assessment 25(6): 793-807.
Pickering NK, Oddy VH, Basarab J, Cammack K, Hayes B, Hegarty RS, Lassen J, McEwan JC, Miller S, Pinares-Patino CS. (2015). Animal board invited review: Genetic possibilities to reduce enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Animal 9: 1431–1440.
Pinares-Patino CS, Baumont R, Martin C. (2003). Methane emissions by Charolais cows grazing a monospecific pasture of timothy at four stages of maturity. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 83: 769–777.
Pineiro-Vazquez AT, Canul-Solis JR, Jimenez-Ferrer GO, Alayon-Gamboa JA, Chay-Canul AJ, Ayala-Burgos AJ, Aguilar-Perez CF, Ku-Vera JC. (2018). Effect of condensed tannins from Leucaena leucocephala on rumen fermentation, methane production and population of rumen protozoa in heifers fed low-quality forage. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science 31: 1738.
Poulsen M, Schwab C, Borg JB, Engberg RM, Spang A, Canibe N, Hojberg O, Milinovich G, Fragner L, Schleper C, Weckwerth W, Lund P, Schramm A, Urich T. (2013). Methylotrophic methanogenic Thermoplasmata implicated in reduced methane emissions from bovine rumen. Nature Communications 4: 1428.
Puchala R, Min BR, Goetsch AL, Sahlu T. (2005). The effect of a condensed tannin-containing forage on methane emission by goats. Journal of Animal Science 83(1): 182–186.
Ramirez-Aviles L, Solorio-Sanchez FJ, Aguilar-Perez CF, Ayala-Burgos AJ, Ku-Vera JC. (2019). Leucaena leucocephala feeding systems for cattle production in Mexico. Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales 7: 375–380.
Ranilla MJ, Jouany JP, Morgavi DP. (2007). Methane production and substrate degradation by rumen microbial communities containing single protozoal. species in vitro. Letters in Applied Microbiology 45: 675–680.
Ripple WJ, Smith P, Haberl H, Montzka SA, McAlpine C, Boucher DH. (2014). Ruminants, climate change and climate policy. Nature Climate Change 4: 2-5.
Robertson LJ, Waghorn GC. (2002). Dairy industry perspectives on methane emissions and production from cattle fed pasture or total mixed rations in New Zealand. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society Animal Production 62: 213–218.
Roque BM, Salwen JK, Kinley R, Kebreab E. (2019). Inclusion of Asparagopsis armata in lactating dairy cows’ diet reduces enteric methane emission by over 50 percent. Journal of Cleaner Production 234: 132–138.
Sauvant D, Giger-Reverdin S. (2007). Empirical modelling meta-analysis of digestive interactions and CH4 production in ruminants. In: Ortigues-Marty I, Miraux N, Brand- Williams W, editors, Energy and protein metabolism and nutrition. EAAP publication no. 124, Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands, p. 561.
Shi WB, Moon CD, Leahy SC, Kang DW, Froula J, Kittelmann S, et al. (2014). Methane yield phenotypes linked to differential gene expression in the sheep rumen microbiome. Genome Research 24: 1517–1525.
Stefenoni HA, Raisanen SE, Cueva SF, Wasson DE, Lage CFA, Melgar A, Fetter ME, Smith P, Hennessy M, Vecchiarelli B, Bender J, Pitta D, Cantrell CL, Yarish C, Hristov AN. (2021). Effects of the macroalga Asparagopsis taxiformis and oregano leaves on methane emission, rumen fermentation, and lactational performance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 104: 4157–4173.
Suybeng B, Charmley E, Gardiner CP, Malau-Aduli BS, Malau-Aduli AE. (2020). Supplementing Northern Australian beef cattle with Desmanthus tropical legume reduces in-vivo methane emissions. Animals 10: 2097.
Tapio I, Snelling TJ, Strozzi F, Wallace RJ. (2017). The ruminal microbiome associated with methane emissions from ruminant livestock. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 8: 7.
Tavendale MH, Meagher LP, Pacheco D, Walker N, Attwood GT, Sivakumaran S. (2005). Methane production from in vitro rumen incubations with Lotus pedunculatus and Medicago sativa, and effects of extractable condensed tannin fractions on methanogenesis. Animal Feed Science and Technology 123-124: 403–419.
Taylor CA, Harrison MT, Telfer M, Eckard R. (2016). Modelled greenhouse gas emissions from beef cattle grazing irrigated leucaena in northern Australia. Animal Production Science 56: 594–604.
Tiemann TT, Lascano CE, Wettstein HR, Mayer AC, Kreuzer M, Hess HD. (2008). Effect of the tropical tannin- rich shrub legumes Calliandra calothyrsus and Flemingia macrophylla on methane emission and nitrogen and energy balance in growing lambs. Animal 2(5): 790–799.
Van Dorland HA, Wettstein HR, Leuenberger H, Kreuzer M. (2007). Effect of supplementation of fresh and ensiled clovers to ryegrass on nitrogen loss and methane emissions of dairy cows. Livestock Science 111: 57–69.
Vandermeulen S, Singh S, Ramirez-Restrepo CA, Kinley RD, Gardiner CP, Holtum JA, Hannah I, Bindelle J. (2018). In vitro assessment of ruminal fermentation, digestibility and methane production of three species of Desmanthus for application in northern Australian grazing systems. Crop Pasture Science 69: 797–807.
Waghorn GC. (2007). Beneficial and detrimental effects of dietary condensed tannins for sustainable sheep and goat production: progress and challenges. Animal Feed Science and Technology 147: 116–139.
Wallace RJ, Rooke JA, Duthie CA, Hyslop JJ, Ross DW, McKain N, de Souza SM, Snelling TJ, Waterhouse A, Roehe R. (2014). Archaeal abundance in post-mortem ruminal digesta may help predict methane emissions from beef cattle. Scientific Reports 4: 5892.
Wallace RJ, Rooke JA, McKain N, Duthie CA, Hyslop JJ, Ross DW, Waterhouse A, Watson M, Roehe R. (2015). The rumen microbial metagenome associated with high methane production in cattle. BMC Genomics 16: 839.
Wedlock DN, Janssen PH, Leahy SC, Shu D, Buddle BM. (2013). Progress in the development of vaccines against rumen methanogens. Animal 7: 244–252.
Wedlock DN, Pedersen G, Denis M, Dey D, Janssen PH, Buddle BM. (2010). Development of a vaccine to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture: vaccination of sheep with methanogen fractions induces antibodies that block methane production in vitro. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 58(1): 29–36.
Williams YJ, Popovski S, Rea SM, Skillman LC, Toovey AF, Northwood KS, Wright ADG. (2009). A vaccine against rumen methanogens can alter the composition of archaeal populations. Applied Environment Microbiology 75: 1860–1866.
Wright AD, Auckland CH, Lynn DH. (2007). Molecular diversity of methanogens in feedlot cattle from Ontario and Prince Edward Island, Canada. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 73: 4206–4210.
Wright AD, Kennedy P, O’Neill CJ, Toovey AF, Popovski S, Rea SM, Pimm CL, Klein L. (2004). Reducing methane emissions in sheep by immunization against rumen methanogens. Vaccine 22: 3976–3985.
Wright ADG, Ma X, Obispo NE. (2008). Methanobrevibacter phylotypes are the dominant methanogens in sheep from Venezuela. Microbial Ecology 56(2): 390–394.
Zhou M, Chung YH, Beauchemin KA, Holtshausen L, Oba M, McAllister TA, Guan LL. (2011). Relationship between rumen methanogens and methane production in dairy cows fed diets supplemented with a feed enzyme additive. Journal of Applied Microbiology 111: 1148–1158.
Zhou MI, Hernandez-Sanabria E, Guan LL. (2010). Characterization of variation in rumen methanogenic communities under different dietary and host feed efficiency conditions, as determined by PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 76(12): 3776–3786.
Zhou MI, Hernandez-Sanabria E, Le LG. (2009). Assessment of the microbial ecology of ruminal methanogens in cattle with different feed efficiencies. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75(20): 6524–6533.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 All the papers accepted for publication in LIAB will be published as open access.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All the papers accepted for publication in LIAB will be published as open access.
Accepted 2022-04-17
Published 2022-04-19
